Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS 1229

Bill Hobba ha escrito:

Yes, Hobba i can. In fact, i did many times. This is not a post on history of relativity. My aim is not repeat again and again ideas and citations. Search in the research zone, search in the discussion on history of relativity at several sites here, search in my own work, etc.

That is not true. After of polemic article in Science, it was claimed that Einstein had not plagiarized Hilbert. However more recent research show that Science article was purely speculative and perhaps one attempt to rewrite history of field.

What historians are studying now is to what extension Einstein copied from Hilbert. somewhat like are studying at what extension copied from PoincarŽ.

You use the word "copy" But nobody call "copy" to obtain work of other, copy it WITHOUT citing them offering as NEW, and after modify data of submissions of papers

You carefully would read i wrote above on that. How Einstein modified data of submisions of papers in his correspondence with Hilbert.

Also Einstein plagiarized PoincarŽ because said newer read and howeover nobody doubt that read several PoincarŽ works (as verified by their colleagues).

Since this is not about history this is my last post

Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS 1230
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) ha escrito: Well, i think that you lose the whole point. 1) I did not say...

Juan R.

Center for CANONICAL SCIENCE)



Kids | Previous | Next

Science research careers courtesy of Debt Consolidation World


Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS 1230 | Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS 1228

Privacy Policy