how to deal with nanny at home 24Irrational Number Well, I think it's all negotiable in my book. It's perfectly reasonable to want a nanny who is *also* experienced...
Elizabeth H Bonesteel
how to deal with nanny at home 22Leslie Are these big issues? (1) She does not squeeze the sponge dry when she's done washing, so it's a disgusting, wet, soppy mess. (2) She has slight nearsightedness...
Really? And yet you were unable to cite a single piece of evidence from those transcripts in support of your contention that "Ms. Woodward was convicted because she was guilty." Instead, the only thing you offered as "evidence" (that was the word you used) of anything at all was a totally untrue accusation about something you claimed LW had said, and which you now admit she didn't say.
So did you read the transcripts with your eyes closed? Or did you read them as thoroughly as you claim to have done, but are still unable to locate in them a single scrap of evidence that LW was guilty of anything whatsoever?
here trial
Then it's a shame you didn't pay any real attention to the evidence, as you obviously didn't.
of
That is misleading; it suggests that her team presented that theory during the trial, which they did not. It was long after the trial had ended that ONE of her lawyers, Harvey Silverglate, put forward that possibility as a purely personal opinion. That is very different from "her defense team" making a "claim".
Emotional? I think it was you who said you were "*horrified*" that someone merely suggested that the Eappens might have been negligent for not having "brought up their issues sooner" when in fact what they could be quite legitimately accused of - all backed by irrefutable evidence if you want it - is far, far more serious than that.
