Babies and A BIZARRE FEDERAL RULE
James Anliot, Esq., please see below.
First this...
PREGNANT WOMEN: Obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30%.
Worse, when babies get stuck, an American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists-ACOG video in effect advises obstetricians to KEEP birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%.
Obstetricians are lying to cover-up.
For the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)...
See Dents in babies' skulls...
It is easy for you to allow your birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30%.
Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - but beware - some obstetricians will let you "try" labor on your side - but will move you back to semisitting or dorsal - close your birth canal for the actual delivery.
Talk to your obstetrician today.
Also, please forward this to your chiropractor.
JAMES ANLIOT, ESQ. says:
"Learn all of the state and federal regulations that affect your business...or...seek help from a qualified professional..."
OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below)
James Anliot, Esq. Director of health care compliance services Affiliated Monitors, Inc. (AMI), a consulting corporation that provides compliance programs to chiropractors and other health care professionals. (617) 275-0620
James,
Gene Veno, President of the Foundation for Chiropractic Progress recently said to chiropractors:
"Federal rules...require you to practice one way and then advise you to practice another." Dynamic Chiropractic November 7, 2005, Volume 23, Issue 23
I believe federal law and regulations mandating that chiropractors radiate all Medicare patients were obviously illegal. (The radiation was made into an option finally in 1997 - but only after two more years of the obviously illegal radiation mandate - which finally expired in 2000. See "Radiation is NOT a tool of managed care," URL below.)
When the federal mandatory radiation rule failed to "sabotage" chiropractic (see quote below), it looks like the sordid fact that chiros complied with it (to get paid) was used to force chiropractic silence on the vaccination issue. (Perhaps forcing chiro silence was the "sabotage"?)
Also possibly related: Chiropractic silence about MDs senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% and gruesomely manipulating babies' spines. More on this below.
At the very least Jim, perhaps you can inform pregnant friends and relatives that obstetricians are senselessly closing birth canals - and that it is easy for them to allow their birth canals to open the "extra" up to 30%.
Obstetricians are also robbing up to 50% of blood volume from EVERY CESAREAN BABY (and in most "cord blood banking" births), according to retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morely, MB ChB FACOG...
Pregnant friends and relatives might be interested in how to easily prevent this too. See below.
Sincerely,
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA
This Open Letter to James Anliot, Esq. will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive.
VACCINATION AND A BIZARRE CHIROPRACTIC SILENCE EXPLAINED - PERHAPS...
(Chiros: See the strange four year delay in Wilk v. AMA discussed below.)
Steven C. Eisen, DC writes:
"Tedd Koren, DC decided...to officially link Barrett to the original conspiracy revealed in Wilk v. AMA...The Barrett v. Koren trial...provided...evidence to show that Barrett was linked to the continued conspiracy against chiropractic."
OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below)
Steven C. Eisen, DC, Research Coordinator Foundation for Health Choice 1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 330, Washington, DCÊ 20036 202-462-8805
Steven,
Tedd Koren, DC and Stephen Barrett, MD are both linked - via their silence - to a mbuttive spinal manipulation crime of obstetricians (among other MD crimes discussed below).
The reason for medical silence is obvious.
But the reason for CHIROPRACTIC silence is not so obvious.
It may be due to chiropractic buttociations being restly afraid that chiropractors will finally be prosecuted for their ongoing Medicare fraudulent billing for adjustment of "correctable"-"documented" vertebral subluxations when in fact there is no evidence that vertebral subluxations even exist let alone cause disease and stop disease when adjusted.
Barrett indicates that back when the Medicare legislation was pbutted, AMA attorney Doyl Taylor told him that someone (AMA?) - aware of the fraud - lobbied Congress to mandate radiation (documentation of vertebral This was intentionally done to "sabotage" chiropractic coverage under Medicare. See below.
REGARDING VACCINATION AND MORE BIZARRE CHIROPRACTIC SILENCE...
The Foundation for Health Choice asks:
"Do you want the freedom to say no to vaccinations?...Should organized medicine, the pharmaceutical companies and government agencies refuse to change this state of affairs, and in fact continue to support it?...Had enough?...Want to go on theÊoffensive?...Then join us."
I believe that organized medicine first played on chiropractic fear of fraud was oficially discovered by the Department of Health and Human Services.
In the last quarter of 1986, ACA Attorney Rosenfeld wrote,
"Chiropractic must join the 'real world' by ceasing opposition to innoculation..." Rosenfeld ACA Journal Oct 1986
The last quarter of 1986 just happened to coincide with a "marked struggle" by MDs and PharmCo's to cause Congress to give them virtual immunity from liability for their mbutt vaccination behavior...Smith MH. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act. Pediatrics. 1988;82(2):264-9
The "last quarter of 1986" ALSO just preceded a key 1987 Congressional battle for FUNDING the vaccine injury act...which MDs and pharmcos had been working to get pbutted since 1983.
Smith 1988 notes that "there were powerful opponents to a mandatory system" back in 1983...
1983 was when PharmCo's and MDs asked Congress for TOTAL immunity from liability - for a system wherein families of vaccine-injured and vaccine-dead children could NOT go to court after being forced through the regulatory process by the new system. Smith 1988:268
1983 also happened to be the year a new trial was ordered in Wilk v. AMA...but the new trial did not get underway until four years later - in 1987...see below...
Sleep with diff caregiversI would have strongly urged you not to let only one person put your daughter to bed. I always try to have both my husband and myself put our daughters to sleep, so...
Fast forward to the last quarter of 1986...the MDs and PharmCo's were on their SECOND try for immunity from vaccination liability...Smith 1988
"The only means of avoiding a complete new beginning of the legislation again in the 100th Congress was to agree that the funding provisions of the legislation be omitted from consideration...and...taken up the next year..."
Smith 1988 notes that the 100th Congress convened in January 1987...
1987 (May) just happened to be the moment in time when Judge Susan Getzendanner decided to convene a non-jury trial in Wilk v. AMA - FOUR YEARS after a trial was ordered.
On August 24, 1987 - as Congress was funding the MD's immunity from vaccine liability program - Judge Getzendanner was ordering the AMA to publicize in JAMA the AMA's "loss" to the chiropractors. Wilk v. AMA, 671 F. Supp. 1465
In December 1987, the vaccine injury act was pbutted by Congress and signed by the President.
On January 1, 1988, under Judge Getzendanner's court order, the AMA published news of the Getzendanner verdict in JAMA.
Has anyone else wondered why the Wilk v. AMA case was suddenly resurrected in May 1987 - FOUR YEARS after the new trial was ordered in 1983?
Probably just another coincidence, right?
REMEMBER: the new trial was ordered back in 1983 when MDs and PharmCo's were making their FIRST attempt at virtual immunity from liability for their mbutt vaccination behavior...
DCs AMONG "POWERFUL OPPONENTS"?
According to Smith 1988, "it became evident early in these 1983 efforts that there were powerful opponents to a mandatory system...furthermore, Congress made it clear that they simply would not consider a system that precluded some opportunity to go to court."
What if it **DCs** were among the "powerful opponents" in 1983?
Even if DCs *weren't* "powerful opponents*, who ARE the "powerful opponents"?
I ask because 81% of DCs *might* just have something in common with "powerful opponents." (The 81% estimate comes from Haas and Colley JMPT 1994:585, as in,
"Eighty-one percent of DCs surveyed felt that vaccination should be strictly voluntary"...
MbuttIVE VACCINATION FRAUD...
Smith 1988 notes: "Reporting requirements HAD TO BE ACCEPTED in the process of negotiations through the years..." (emphasis added)
Smith 1988 also notes: "Congress had DEMANDED the inclusion of the reaction reporting requirements as a condition of the legislation. It will give a better epidemiologic store of information concerning the real facts in vaccine reactions than we have ever had before."
ARRGGGHHH!...Congress had to DEMAND that MDs report serious vaccine reactions?
Years later, in 1993, then-FDA Commissioner David Kessler, MD offered evidence that physicians were STILL failing to report up to 99% of serious adverse reactions to MEDICATIONS - and this inspite of the fact that such reports are "essential" for determining the safety of medications. Kessler DA. Introducing MEDWatch: a new approach to reporting medication and device adverse effects and product problems. JAMA (Jun2)1993;268 plus 1(21):2765-68
...I mention the potential 99% failure-to-report rate for MEDICATIONS because CDC's Vaccination Information Sheets compare safety of medications (unknown) with safety of vaccinations (unknown).
INTERESTINGLY: The American Chiropractic buttociation-ACA initially did not support the Wilk v. AMA lawsuit. The ACA in effect told Dr. Chester Wilk to go to hell - because ACA was holding all-important behind-the-scenes talks with AMA... Dr. Wilk says that his discussions with ACA General Counsel Harry Rosenfeld were almost "dogfights." See Wilk. Medicine, Monopolies and Malice. Garden City Park, NY: Avery 1996
We must ask ourselves: What *were* ACA and AMA "dialoguing" about in the 70s and 80s?
What business did ACA's Rosenfeld have exhorting DCs to do what an estimated 81% (perhaps more) of them didn't want to do - end their opposition to mandatory vaccination? (NOTE: When DCs are finally truly informed regarding CDC's sordid adverse event reporting behavior - the percent opposed to MANDATORY vaccination will likely be closer to 100%.)
I submit that in October 1986 Mr. Rosenfeld and the ACA were currying favor with AMA at an extremely critical time in the pharmaceutical industry's effort to win from Congress immunity from liability for themselves and MDs for vaccine injuries and rests.
I submit further that the MD-dominated HHS was not prosecuting obvious DC health fraud - known about in 1972 and "officially" discovered in 1986 - in order to offer DCs a reason to be silent as organized medicine went for immunity from liability for mbutt vaccination behavior.
VACCINATION SUBLUXATION misc.health.alternative-msg-05d5ea68f816b93e
and from,
PPAC, vaccinations and chiro bouncer Bob (Bob Dubin, Diplomate, American Board of Chiropractic Censorship) misc.kids.pregnancy-msg-e393ae3facee79d7
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA
PS Here's another post, alluded to above, regarding Koren's recent courtroom victory over Barrett...
----------
Wondering about labour pain 1972Lady Penelope Creighton-Ward Yes--there have been some recent studies coming out re-emphasizing how epidurals can slow labor and increase the need for augmentation...
chiropractor?
CHIROPRACTOR?
Tedd Koren, DC reportedly beat "Quackbuster" Steve Barrett, MD in court.
See the very end of this post.
Oddly, Koren and Barrett are both ignoring mbuttive spinal manipulation quackery - by the most prolific manipulators of children's spines - MDs.
REGARDING BABIES...
PREGNANT WOMEN: You can help prevent spinal manipulation quackery by MDs. Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use some other "alternative" delivery position. Talk to your OB or midwife today.
Please forward this email to your chiropractor.
Your chiropractor may wish to start informing pregnant women that obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30% - and that it is easy for women to allow their birth canals to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%.
With birth canals senselessly closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%, obstetricians are pulling with hands, forceps and vacuums - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords.
Note: Bizarrely, California chiropractors MAY be forbidden from educating pregnant women about this - or so I was informed years ago by a man calling himself Michael Schroeder, attorney for the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners. Schroeder is an honorary member of the California Chiropractic buttociation - and friend of BOB DUBIN, DC - who is now with the New Mexico Chiropractic buttociation.
See the end of this post.
Attn: NEW MEXICO Board of Chiropractic Examiners Chairwoman Dr. Leslie Schmidt - via NMBCE members Dr. Bill Doggett and Dr. Michael Plaman and Dr. Guruchander Khalsa:
Is it legal in New Mexico for DCs to inform pregnant women that obstetricians are closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%?
ALSO: Is the New Mexico Board of Chiropractic Examiners doing anything to Open Letter to Gene Veno below?
Gene Veno, President of the Foundation for Chiropractic Progress says to chiropractors:
"Federal rules...require you to practice one way and then advise you to practice another." Dynamic Chiropractic November 7, 2005, Volume 23, Issue 23
OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below)
Gene Veno President Foundation for Chiropractic Progress
Gene,
Hmmmm....
Federal rules require chiropractors to practice one way and then advise them to practice another...
You aren't by any chance referring to CHIRO COMEDY HEALTH CRIME - the fact that federal Medicare rules-laws forbid chiropractors from submitting fraudulent bills even as federal Medicare rules-laws require chiropractors - if they wish to be paid - to fraudulently claim on their bills that they have identified correctable, disease-causing vertebral subluxations?
It's a sordidly hilarious comedy: Congress' first Medicare law required Medicare patients be subjected to ionizing radiation before their spinal adjustments. Then in 1997, Congress acknowledged that it is illegal to mandate radiation of chiropractic patients prior to treatment - but Congress kept the radiation mandate for two years - because the Congressional Budget Office determined that if the radiation mandate were removed too soon - too many people would go to chiropractors and it would cost the government too much! The American Chiropractic buttociation (Mike Pedigo, DC was president) silently went along with the radiation gag! LOL! (It *is* sort of funny, after all!)
See Radiation is NOT a tool of managed care! sci.med-msg-9930156e31bd2fe7?
Also sort of funny: The Medicare ionizing radiation mandate for documenting vertebral subluxations is now optional - but the mandatory Medicare fraud is not: Chiropractors still must document having identified correctable, disease-causing vertebral subluxations before treating Medicare patients - even though there is NO scientific evidence that vertebral subluxations cause disease and stop causing disease when adjusted.
The kicker: There never was any such evidence - and the chiropractic profession TOLD Congress this way back in 1973.
voluntarily...) misc.kids.pregnancy-msg-9e0c34fe3be2efe3?
I suspect it was "Quackbusters" (Steve Barrett, MD et al? The AMA?) who lobbied and got the obviously illegal radiation mandate pbutted by Congress.
AMA member Stephen Barrett reported in 1995 that AMA attorney Doyl Taylor told him that when it appeared that chiropractic reimbursement under language was inserted to "sabotage" chiropractic. Magner, Barrett (ghost). Chiropractic: The Victim's Perspective. Amherst, NY: Prometheus 1995:3 ÊSee also
Fortunately, Congress' obviously illegal radiation mandate accorded with the before applying high velocity-low amplitude thrusts...While there is radiation fraud - it can serve an important purpose if there is radiographically demonstrable gross pathology in the spine.
Something far worse than possibly beneficial Medicare radiation fraud is going on in medicine...
MDs GET AWAY WITH FAR WORSE HEALTH CRIME...
Simple biomechanics Gastaldo TD. Birth. 1992;19(4):230-1 require obstetricians to allow birth canals to open an "extra" up to 30%; yet obstetric texts advise obstetricians to, in effect, CLOSE birth canals the "extra" up to 30%.
Worse, when babies get stuck, an American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists-ACOG video in effect advises obstetricians to KEEP birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%.
Obstetricians are lying to cover-up.
For the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)...
See Dents in babies' skulls...
UNNECESSARY SPINAL MANIPULATION
It's a mbuttive spinal manipulation crime. As obstetricians keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%, they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords.
Some babies die - some get paralyzed - most "only" have their spines gruesomely wrenched. (Any estimated 4.6% of "health" term babies are born with unexplained brain bleeds.)
ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30%.
UNNECESSARY EPISIOTOMIES-UNNECESSARY C-SECTIONS
There is also the matter of obstetricians slicing privatess and abdomens en mbutte (episiotomy-c-section) - surgically-fraudulently inferring they are doing-have done everything possible to open birth canals - even as they keep birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%.
To be sure, compelling obstetricians to allow birth canals to open the "extra" up to 30% is not going to prevent all episiotomies, c-sections and forceps deliveries - it's just that obstetricians have no business keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%.
The kicker is that obstetricians are telling obvious lies to cover-up.
Again, for the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)...
See Dents in babies' skulls...
MORE OBSTETRIC CRIME
Obstetricians are immediately clamping umbilical cords - temporarily asphyxiating babies - cutting off umbilical cord oxygen - forcing babies to breathe with their lungs before they are ready - and in the process robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.
Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates the mbuttive blood robbery happens to EVERY CESAREAN BABY - and in most "cord blood banking" births....
See Water birth and breathing without lungs...
HOW MDs GET AWAY WITH THESE (AND OTHER) MbuttIVE CRIMES...
Law enforcement officers (attorney generals) look the other way - and as Steve B. Harris, MD once boasted:
"Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime. ÊThese are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you."
THE SAD FACT IS...
Chiropractors are competing with a mbuttive criminal enterprise euphemistically known as medical "science."
Gene, you said to chiropractors:
"...Just because you have a license to practice does not guarantee your practice is free from governmental intrusion."
Yes, but chiropractic's main economic compebreastors ARE free from governmental intrusion in an important respect: Law enforcement is ignoring obvious MD lies and letting MDs commit obvious mbuttive (sometimes bane) crimes against mothers and babies.
NOTE: Chiropractic is free from governmental intrusion in regard to IT'S ongoing crime - and that may be the reason for the bizarre silence of chiropractors regarding the mbuttive spinal manipulation crime of MDs.
Gene, you also
"Be very careful to understand that your scope of practice in your respective state is as valuable, if not more valuable, than your individual license to practice."
Well said!
I stopped paying for (voluntarily forfeited) my chiropractic license after I was told^^^ that telling women that obstetricians are closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30% is outside the scope of chiropractic practice in California.
^^^I was told this years ago by a man calling himself Michael Schroeder, attorney for the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners. Years later, I was SUED by a man calling himself Michael Schroeder who was once an attorney for the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners. More on this below.
ATTENTION CALIFORNIA CHIROPRACTORS:
IS it outside the scope of chiropractic in California to tell pregnant women that obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30%?
It's been two years - I've asked the Board a few times - no answer yet...
See Birth Danger: Cal Chiro Bd - SIMPLE QUESTION
FINALLY GENE...
WHY THE SILENCE...
You
"By now, I am sure you are getting the picture that you cannot practice these days without national and state representation, to ensure that your right to practice is protected on all levels."
Ummmm Gene... In addition to the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners remaining silent, prominent people at national and state chiropractic buttociations have also remained silent. (The names Bob Dubin, DC and James Edwards, DC spring to mind. I will copy them at
National and state chiropractic buttociations are making NO protest about the obvious, mbuttive spinal manipulation crime of MDs.
Nor are national and state chiropractic buttociations making any protest that the California State Board of Chiropractic Examiners won't answer my SIMPLE QUESTION.
You yourself have been silent. Or maybe you just didn't receive or read my previous emails?
Gene, if you ever get an answer to my SIMPLE QUESTION from the Calif. Chiro Bd. of Examiners (or any other chiro board), I hope you'll share it with me - preferably publicly.
Since you are interested in chiropractic progress, consider this:
Chiropractic is missing out on a GOLDEN opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand. (See the mbuttive spinal manipulation crime of MDs discussed above.)
REMEMBER GENE: Preventing vertebral subluxations is included in the STANDARDS of the Council on Chiropractic Education-CCE, as in,
Health promotion is "inclusive of subluxation prevention" CCE Standards, p. 56 or 66 (pdf version)
I recently noted this subluxation prevention fact for CCE President Joseph Brimhall, DC....
See Babies, CCE and upper cervical chiropractic... misc.kids.pregnancy-msg-53e7391731c561c6
CCE Pres. Brimhall never got back to me.
Thanks for reading Gene.
Sincerely,
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA
Copied to:
NEW MEXICO CHIROPRACTIC buttOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2005-2006
Executive Committee President Dr. Susan M. Bright 1504 St. Francis Dr. Santa Fe, NM 87505 Office: 505-984-1222 Fax: 505-984-1376
Vice President Dr. Harold Steinberg 1400 Maclovia St., Ste. 1 Santa Fe, NM 87505 Office: 505-473-0057 Fax: 505-473-7974
Treasurer Dr. Susan Hilliker P. O. Box 1687 Taos, NM 87571 Office: 505-758-3050
Secretary Dr. Robert Woodruff 2904 Montclaire, NE Albuquerque, NM 87110 Office: 505-865-3333 Fax: 505-865-3840
Past President Dr. Michael Pendleton 7520 Montgomery, NE, #E-9 Albuquerque, NM 87109 Office: 505-888-6800 Fax: 505-888-6812
Executive Director Jaeni Aarden 10700 Academy Rd., NE, #817 Albuquerque, NM 87111 Office: 505-280-0689 Fax: 505-828-1128
Board of Directors
Central Dist. Directors Dr. David Peer 7520 Montgomery, NE, #E-9 Albuquerque, NM 87109 Office: 505-888-6800 Fax: 505-888-6812
Dr. Bob Dubin 03 Homesteads Road, Suite E Placitas, NM 87043 505-771-3933
Dr. Norman Dawson 12932 Granite Avenue, NE Albuquerque, NM 87112 505-275-0422
Ê Ê East Central District Director
Dr. Bill Smith 1400 S. Ave. D, #A Portales, NM 88130 Office: 505-356-4440 Fax: 505-356-4433
North Central District Directors Dr. Michael Crawford #11 Calle Medico, Ste. 3 Santa Fe, NM 87505 Office: 505-983-3037 Fax: 505-982-3737
Dr. Susan Pisano 208 Camino Rio Santa Fe, NM 87505 Office: 505-982-0288
Northeast District Director Dr. Monty McGowen 1800 Hospital Drive Raton, NM 87740 Office: 505-445-0222 Fax: 505-445-0222
Northwest District Director
Dr. Andy Sandoval 4251 E. Main St., #F Farmington, NM 87402 Office: 505-325-3355 Fax: 505-325-4479
South Central District Directors Dr. Douglas Patrick 1301 Oregon Ave. Alamogordo, NM 88310 Office: 505-437-0667 Fax: 505-437-0083
Southeast District Director Dr. Kendall Boyd P. O. Box 113 Jal, NM 88252 Office: 505-395-2311 Fax: 505-395-2750
Ê Ê Southwest District Director Dr. John Rogers 1205 N. West Street Silver City, NM 88061 Office: 505-538-2558 Fax 505-538-3996
Ê Ê West Central District Director Dr. Wayne Goforth 108 Hill Street Gallup, NM 87301 Office: 505-722-9002 Fax: 505-722-7031
Ê Ê Committee Chairs ACA Liaison Nat'l Legislative Affairs Dr. Bill Doggett 3500 Comanche, NE, Suite I Albuquerque, NM 87107 Office: 505-884-0771 Fax: 505-884-0776 www.sunbear.cc
Ê COCSA Committee Dr. John A. Rogers 1205 N. West Street Silver City, NM 88061 Office: 505-538-2558 Fax: 505-538-3996
Convention Committee Dr. Michael Pendleton 7520 Montgomery, NE, E-9 Albuquerque, NM 87109 Office: 505-888-6800 Fax: 505-888-6812 Education Committee Dr. Ben Markham 5200 Eubank, NE, Suite B-1 Albuquerque, NM 87111 Office: 505-237-1050 Fax: 505-237-0113 Ê
Ethics-Bylaws Committee Dr. Elaine Adams 7007 Wyoming, NE, E-1 Albuquerque, NM 87109 Office: 505-822-0306 Fax: 505-822-0316 chiropractic.com
Ê Insurance Relations Dr. Robert E. Byrd 7611 Indian School Rd., NE Albuquerque, NM 87110 Office: 505-268-0808 Fax: 505-278-2458 Legislative Dr. Stephen Perlstein Dr. Sherry Gaber 2019 Galisteo St., Ste. M6 Santa Fe, NM 87505 Office: 505-984-0006 Fax: 505-995-0884 Medicare Dr. Gretchen Peterson Dr. James M. Barber, Alt. 3701 Eubank, NE, #24 Albuquerque, NM 87111 Office: 505-299-4446 Fax: 505-275-8505
Membership-Pub. Relations Dr. Bob Dubin 5 Cerrito Rojo Road Placitas, NM 87043 Office: 505-771-9833
Peer Review Dr. David Peer 7520 Montgomery, NE, #E-9 Albuquerque, NM 87109 Office: 505-888-6800 Fax: 505-888-6812
Scholarship Dr. Kevin Atchley 8004 Pennsylvania Cr., NE Albuquerque, NM 87110 Office: 505-265-5651 Fax: 505-268-0820 Scholarship Information
Worker's Compensation Dr. George Simmons 10401 Montgomery Pkwy., NE Albuquerque, NM 87111 Office: 505-299-7077 Fax: 505-292-6368 plus 1 NMCA Members on NMCA Member Delegate to Congress of Chiropractic State buttociations Dr. John Rogers 1205 N. West Street Silver City, NM 88061 Office: 505-538-2558 Fax 505-538-3996
NMCA Attorney Angela M. Martinez, Esq. Law Office of Angela M. Martinez 10131 Coors Rd. I-2 PMB #715 Albuquerque, NM 87114 Office: 505-710-6725 Fax: 505-890-4517
"QUACKBUSTER" LOSES TO CHIROPRACTOR...
As noted above...
In 1995, AMA member and "Quackbuster" Stephen Barrett, MD reported that AMA attorney Doyl Taylor told him that when it appeared that chiropractic reimbursement under Medicare was inevitable, "subluxation demonstrated to Barrett (ghost). Chiropractic: The Victim's Perspective. Amherst, NY: Prometheus 1995:3 ÊSee also
Now in 2005, "Quackbuster" Barrett recently lost a court case to Tedd Koren, DC...
The funny thing is - both "Quackbuster" Barrett and Tedd Koren, DC are silent about the mbuttive criminal quackery of obstetricians.
Silence on both sides of the health care aisle is something to ponder as babies sometimes DIE from spinal manipulation - as obstetricians manipulate their spines with birth canals senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%.
In 2002, I quoted from a 2001 newsletter by Tedd Koren, DC:
"Dr. Winterstein of National College of Chiropractic...states as a 'fact' that,
'We have not yet demonstrated, through scientific evidence, that spinal subluxation is a causative agent in human disease or dis-ease, nor that we can actually 'correct' subluxation...This fundamental concept of chiropractic has not been scientifically tested." (p. 10)
Dr. Koren then
--Tedd Koren, DC What is a Subluxation? as soon as Dr. Koren puts it up.)
TWO COINCIDENCES...
1. Tedd Koren, DC has two MD brothers - one an obstetrician. (I should note that two of my brothers are MDs - but we are estranged - with both of them refusing so far to speak out about the mbuttive obstetric crimes. Then again, perhaps neither of them have seen my emails. I doubt it.)
2. Bob Dubin, DC, mentioned above, said he persuaded Michael Schroeder, formerly attorney for the California Board, not to sue other DCs when he (Schroeder) sued me.
It turned out Schroeder's lawsuit was a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation-SLAPP - an illegal attempt to deny me my First Amendment right to pebreastion for redress of grievances caused by Schroeder in his role as a public official - attorney for the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners.
California DCs used to attend births - indeed - at one time attending a birth was a requirement for chiropractic licensure in California.
Schroeder was working for the Caliifornia Chiropractic buttociation during the bizarre case against California's last chiropractic obstetrician, Laura Flores, DC, PhD. (Dr. Flores' patients did not sue - district attorneys sued - and she beat them - but ultimately - IIRC - the chiropractic board took her license.)
After Dr. Flores was out of the way, Schroeder wrote a regulation (Rule 302) that prohibited California DCs from so much as severing umbilical cords and then jumped to the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners to defend Rule 302 from 10 MD-obstetricians who were ostensibly attacking Rule 302 - but who - I suspect - were getting Rule 302 judicially rubberstamped.
MD-obstetricians were then - and are still - committing a mbuttive baby asphxiation-baby blood robbery crime (mentioned above) and they did NOT need chiropractors to be able to testify as experts - or so I say.
Dubin - who said he persuaded Schroeder to sue only me - moved from California to New Mexico - which is why I have cc'd Dubin and his fellow New Mexico Chiropractic buttociation members (listed above).
I think it is time - finally - for chiropractic boards to speak out and stop both the ongoing Medicare radiation fraud AND (especially) the ongoing spinal manipulation crime of MDs.
Hopefully the New Mexico Chiropractic Board will lead the way - with Dubin and other New Mexico Chiropractic buttociation members publicly encouraging such action.
As usual, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students, MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies.
Thanks for reading everyone.
Sincerely,
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA
This Open Letter to Gene Veno will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive.
'Quackbuster' Barrett loses to a chiropractor?"
